7 Steps to Keep Your Best Employees
How do you keep talent from leaving, or from disengaging but staying? There are two kinds of workplace engagement. Macro-engagement is what organizations can do, by way of policies and practices; micr...
The client company in this case study is in what most would call a “mature” segment of the economy - Corporate Accounts in the Retail Office Supply industry. While the company had done well for years, like most companies, it was highly interested in increasing its share of this inelastic market. At the same time, the company was experiencing relatively high turnover in its sales positions.
We suggested that an analysis of the sales force, followed by recommendations for selection process changes, could be their solution. The assessment chosen was the Profiles Sales Assessment (PSA). In the first year, two groups of 12 salespeople were assessed, using the PSA: A group of the Top Performers (based on annual sales volume), and a group at the very bottom of annual production, the Bottom Performers. Using the Top Performers to produce a Success Pattern, it was found that the two groups were markedly different in their Match Scores to the pattern; they were even more remarkably different in their sales production.
These results are summarized here:
|
![]() |
This company had previously developed documentation of the cost of turn-over in the sales department. When advertising, recruiting, hiring, training, compensation, and termination were figured in, the average cost per turnover was estimated at $15,000!
In the second year, following the recommendations developed from the PSA data, the company applied the PSA as a selection tool, and also used the Management Reports to coach the existing employees and new hires throughout the year.
In the first 10 months of the year, these were the results: Sales turnover dropped from an annual rate of 65.48% to 23.26%, a reduction by two-thirds!
The company calculated potential annual sales increase available, if all 12 Bottom Performers were replaced by Top Performers:
$2,150,940!
Over three years, with a turnover rate reduced to an acceptable rate of 25% or less, total costs of the PSA in use were estimated at $36,000. Even if all of the sales gain were deferred until the end of a three year term, sales volume increase would exceed costs by a factor of 58:1.
As the Bottom Performers continue to be replaced, with potential Top Performers, additional gains will be realized. Ultimately, market share will increase!
How do you keep talent from leaving, or from disengaging but staying? There are two kinds of workplace engagement. Macro-engagement is what organizations can do, by way of policies and practices; micr...
One major international hotel company committed to adding assessments to the hiring process, and at first the execution was uneven. That is, until they calculated the ROI in the properties that were r...
Employees at risk create Customers at risk, which puts Revenue at risk. Don't bother managing performance unless you're first managing engagement.